mirror of
https://github.com/Monadical-SAS/reflector.git
synced 2025-12-20 20:29:06 +00:00
update gitignore
This commit is contained in:
3
.gitignore
vendored
3
.gitignore
vendored
@@ -162,6 +162,9 @@ cython_debug/
|
||||
*.mp4
|
||||
summary.txt
|
||||
transcript.txt
|
||||
transcript_timestamps.txt
|
||||
*.html
|
||||
*.pkl
|
||||
*.ini
|
||||
test_samples/
|
||||
*.wav
|
||||
@@ -1,47 +0,0 @@
|
||||
AGENDA: Most important things to look for in a start up
|
||||
|
||||
TAM: Make sure the market is sufficiently large than once they win they can get rewarded
|
||||
- Medium sized markets that should be winner take all can work
|
||||
- TAM needs to be realistic of direct market size
|
||||
|
||||
Product market fit: Being in a good market with a product than can satisfy that market
|
||||
- Solves a problem
|
||||
- Builds a solution a customer wants to buy
|
||||
- Either saves the customer something (time/money/pain) or gives them something (revenue/enjoyment)
|
||||
|
||||
Unit economics: Profit for delivering all-in cost must be attractive (% or $ amount)
|
||||
- Revenue minus direct costs
|
||||
- Raw input costs (materials, variable labour), direct cost of delivering and servicing the sale
|
||||
- Attractive as a % of sales so it can contribute to fixed overhead
|
||||
- Look for high incremental contribution margin
|
||||
|
||||
LTV CAC: Life-time value (revenue contribution) vs cost to acquire customer must be healthy
|
||||
- LTV = Purchase value x number of purchases x customer lifespan
|
||||
- CAC = All-in costs of sales + marketing over number of new customer additions
|
||||
- Strong reputation leads to referrals leads to lower CAC. Want customers evangelizing product/service
|
||||
- Rule of thumb higher than 3
|
||||
|
||||
Churn: Fits into LTV, low churn leads to higher LTV and helps keep future CAC down
|
||||
- Selling to replenish revenue every year is hard
|
||||
- Can run through entire customer base over time
|
||||
- Low churn builds strong net dollar retention
|
||||
|
||||
Business: Must have sufficient barriers to entry to ward off copy-cats once established
|
||||
- High switching costs (lock-in)
|
||||
- Addictive
|
||||
- Steep learning curve once adopted (form of switching cost)
|
||||
- Two sided liquidity
|
||||
- Patents, IP, Branding
|
||||
- No hyper-scaler who can roll over you quickly
|
||||
- Scale could be a barrier to entry but works against most start-ups, not for them
|
||||
- Once developed, answer question: Could a well funded competitor starting up today easily duplicate this business or is it cheaper to buy the start up?
|
||||
|
||||
Founders: Must be religious about their product. Believe they will change the world against all odds.
|
||||
- Just money in the bank is not enough to build a successful company. Just good tech not enough
|
||||
to build a successful company
|
||||
- Founders must be motivated to build something, not (all) about money. They would be doing
|
||||
this for free because they believe in it. Not looking for quick score
|
||||
- Founders must be persuasive. They will be asking others to sacrifice to make their dream come
|
||||
to life. They will need to convince investors this company can work and deserves funding.
|
||||
- Must understand who the customer is and what problem they are helping to solve.
|
||||
- Founders aren’t expected to know all the preceding points in this document but have an understanding of most of this, and be able to offer a vision.
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user