This repository has been archived on 2026-03-13. You can view files and clone it. You cannot open issues or pull requests or push a commit.
Files
greywall/docs/troubleshooting.md
Mathieu Virbel da3a2ac3a4 rename Fence to Greywall as GreyHaven sandboxing component
Rebrand the project from Fence to Greywall, the sandboxing layer of the
GreyHaven platform. This updates:

- Go module path to gitea.app.monadical.io/monadical/greywall
- Binary name, CLI help text, and all usage examples
- Config paths (~/.config/greywall/greywall.json), env vars (GREYWALL_*)
- Log prefixes ([greywall:*]), temp file prefixes (greywall-*)
- All documentation, scripts, CI workflows, and example files
- README rewritten with GreyHaven branding and Fence attribution

Directory/file renames: cmd/fence → cmd/greywall, pkg/fence → pkg/greywall,
docs/why-fence.md → docs/why-greywall.md, example JSON files, and banner.
2026-02-10 16:00:24 -06:00

171 lines
5.0 KiB
Markdown

# Troubleshooting
## Nested Sandboxing Not Supported
Greywall cannot run inside another sandbox that uses the same underlying technology.
**macOS (Seatbelt)**: If you try to run greywall inside an existing `sandbox-exec` sandbox (e.g., Nix's Darwin build sandbox), you'll see:
```text
Sandbox: sandbox-exec(...) deny(1) forbidden-sandbox-reinit
```
This is a macOS kernel limitation - nested Seatbelt sandboxes are not allowed. There is no workaround.
**Linux (Landlock)**: Landlock supports stacking (nested restrictions), but greywall's test binaries cannot use the Landlock wrapper (see [Testing docs](testing.md#sandboxed-build-environments-nix-etc)).
## "bwrap: loopback: Failed RTM_NEWADDR: Operation not permitted" (Linux)
This error occurs when greywall tries to create a network namespace but the environment lacks the `CAP_NET_ADMIN` capability. This is common in:
- **Docker containers** (unless run with `--privileged` or `--cap-add=NET_ADMIN`)
- **GitHub Actions** and other CI runners
- **Ubuntu 24.04+** with restrictive AppArmor policies
- **Kubernetes pods** without elevated security contexts
**What happens now:**
Greywall automatically detects this limitation and falls back to running **without network namespace isolation**. The sandbox still provides:
- Filesystem restrictions (read-only root, allowWrite paths)
- PID namespace isolation
- Seccomp syscall filtering
- Landlock (if available)
**What's reduced:**
- Network isolation via namespace is skipped
- The proxy-based domain filtering still works (via `HTTP_PROXY`/`HTTPS_PROXY`)
- But programs that bypass proxy env vars won't be network-isolated
**To check if your environment supports network namespaces:**
```bash
greywall --linux-features
```
Look for "Network namespace (--unshare-net): true/false"
**Solutions if you need full network isolation:**
1. **Run with elevated privileges:**
```bash
sudo greywall <command>
```
2. **In Docker, add capability:**
```bash
docker run --cap-add=NET_ADMIN ...
```
3. **In GitHub Actions**, this typically isn't possible without self-hosted runners with elevated permissions.
4. **On Ubuntu 24.04+**, you may need to modify AppArmor profiles (see [Ubuntu bug 2069526](https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2069526)).
## "bwrap: setting up uid map: Permission denied" (Linux)
This error occurs when bwrap cannot create user namespaces. This typically happens when:
- The `uidmap` package is not installed
- `/etc/subuid` and `/etc/subgid` are not configured for your user
- bwrap is not setuid
**Quick fix (if you have root access):**
```bash
# Install uidmap
sudo apt install uidmap # Debian/Ubuntu
# Make bwrap setuid
sudo chmod u+s $(which bwrap)
```
**Or configure subuid/subgid for your user:**
```bash
echo "$(whoami):100000:65536" | sudo tee -a /etc/subuid
echo "$(whoami):100000:65536" | sudo tee -a /etc/subgid
```
On most systems with package-manager-installed bwrap, this error shouldn't occur. If it does, your system may have non-standard security policies.
## "curl: (56) CONNECT tunnel failed, response 403"
This usually means:
- the process tried to reach a domain that is **not allowed**, and
- the request went through greywall's HTTP proxy, which returned `403`.
Fix:
- Run with monitor mode to see what was blocked:
- `greywall -m <command>`
- Add the required destination(s) to `network.allowedDomains`.
## "It works outside greywall but not inside"
Start with:
- `greywall -m <command>` to see what's being denied
- `greywall -d <command>` to see full proxy and sandbox detail
Common causes:
- Missing `allowedDomains`
- A tool attempting direct sockets that don't respect proxy environment variables
- Localhost outbound blocked (DB/cache on `127.0.0.1`)
- Writes blocked (you didn't include a directory in `filesystem.allowWrite`)
## Node.js HTTP(S) doesn't use proxy env vars by default
Node's built-in `http`/`https` modules ignore `HTTP_PROXY`/`HTTPS_PROXY`.
If your Node code makes outbound HTTP(S) requests, use a proxy-aware client.
For example with `undici`:
```javascript
import { ProxyAgent, fetch } from "undici";
const proxyUrl = process.env.HTTPS_PROXY;
const response = await fetch(url, {
dispatcher: new ProxyAgent(proxyUrl),
});
```
Greywall's OS-level sandbox should still block direct connections; the above makes your requests go through the filtering proxy so allowlisting works as intended.
## Local services (Redis/Postgres/etc.) fail inside the sandbox
If your process needs to connect to `localhost` services, set:
```json
{
"network": { "allowLocalOutbound": true }
}
```
If you're running a server inside the sandbox that must accept connections:
- set `network.allowLocalBinding: true` (to bind)
- use `-p <port>` (to expose inbound port(s))
## "Permission denied" on file writes
Writes are denied by default.
- Add the minimum required writable directories to `filesystem.allowWrite`.
- Protect sensitive targets with `filesystem.denyWrite` (and note greywall protects some targets regardless).
Example:
```json
{
"filesystem": {
"allowWrite": [".", "/tmp"],
"denyWrite": [".env", "*.key"]
}
}
```